Search This Blog

2 kinds of Appetites!

 In the quiet town of Lalgudi, where boys still compared cricket bats, school ranks, and the occasional new possession, young Krishnan had begun to notice a strange emptiness that followed even small successes. After eating a good meal he felt content. Yet after gaining a higher place in class or receiving a word of praise, the satisfaction faded quickly and a fresh wanting took its place. He wondered why some desires left him peaceful while others left him poorer than before.

One evening on the terrace he spoke of this to Uncle Venkatesh.

“Uncle, when I am hungry and then eat, I feel complete for a while. But when I get the recognition I wanted, I soon want something more. It never seems to end.”

Uncle Venkatesh opened a book of Stoic reflections by Ward Farnsworth and read a few clear lines:

“There are two kinds of appetites. Natural appetites, such as hunger, are finite and can be fully satisfied. They may return later, yet there is a limit to them, and at the end of satisfaction one feels rich. Unnatural appetites, such as the wish for status, can never quite be satisfied. They have no limits, and so one feels poor even while attaining them. If there is no limit, there is no bottom. It is like chasing the horizon. Even a beggar’s bowl has a bottom, while the craving man holds a bottomless bowl—however much it takes in, it never fills. Seneca says there is no terminus to what is false. And Samuel Johnson observed that necessity has limits; superfluity does not. Where necessity ends, superfluity begins.”

Krishnan sat quietly, picturing a simple bowl that could be filled and a bottomless one that never could.

The next day he began to watch his own appetites more carefully. When hunger arose he ate his regular meal with attention and noticed the clear sense of enough that followed. That was a natural appetite—finite, honest, and able to end in contentment. But when he found himself longing for the top rank, or for more praise than the others received, he paused and asked whether this desire had any natural limit. He saw that it did not. Each small success only opened the door to a further wish. The bowl had no bottom.

He practised treating the natural appetites with simple care and the unnatural ones with gentle suspicion. He still worked hard at his lessons, yet he no longer demanded that the work produce endless recognition. He still enjoyed a good innings at cricket, yet he did not need the whole school to notice. When the old craving for status arose, he reminded himself that it belonged to the bottomless bowl and could never be filled by more of the same.

At first the unnatural appetites protested loudly. The mind insisted that just one more achievement would bring lasting satisfaction. Yet each time he refused to keep pouring into the bottomless bowl, a quieter richness appeared—the same quiet he felt after a simple, sufficient meal.

Weeks later he sat again with Uncle Venkatesh as the sky turned deep blue.

“Uncle,” Krishnan said, “I am learning to tell the two kinds of appetites apart. The natural ones end in a feeling of enough. The unnatural ones have no terminus and leave me feeling poor no matter what I gain. When I stop chasing the horizon of status and stick to what is truly necessary, the day feels more complete. I understand now why the craving man is never rich, even when his bowl seems full.”

Uncle Venkatesh smiled. “That is the practical wisdom of the Stoics. Honour the natural limits. Refuse the false infinity of superfluity. Keep your bowl the kind that can be filled, and you will often feel rich with little. Continue this watching. In time the bottomless wants lose their power, and the ordinary satisfactions appetites become enough.”

In the soft dusk of Lalgudi, while many still poured effort into desires that could never be completed, young Krishnan walked home with a lighter step. He had begun to distinguish the finite from the endless, the necessary from the superfluous, the bowl with a bottom from the one without. And in that quiet daily practice, he discovered a simple wealth that no amount of status could give—and that no sudden loss of status could take away.